Facebook
Popular Active Recommended Random New
Submitted on May 31, 13:55 ET
US104 - Responsible Corporate Decision-Making
Description
If corporations are made to pay for the negative effects of their business, these negatives will factor into their bottom line and thus their decision-making. They will have to manage and minimize these costs to deliver maximum shareholder value. The problem now with corporate decision-making is it's not on the hook for many key costs (e.g., lives for cigarettes companies, emissions for oil/gas/car companies, financial crises for highly-levered banks). We can align incentives and have things go better by making them pay. 

The payment could come in various ways - through monetary damages, replacement, etc. - and be to individuals or to government funds.
Arguments
1 of 2
Corporations have to pay for negative effects to some extent through the legal system (e.g., defective product causes physical injury), but this system of collecting after the harm only captures a small fraction of offenses. Congress should give increased regulatory authority to make them pay for negative externalities.
Submitted by Greg Orr on May 31, 17:56 ET
3 Agree 0 Disagree
Great idea. Right now the government and the public has to shoulder the burden of externalities. If the goods or services you sell at a profit in turn create costs for society or government, and you are made to feel some pain with those effects, you will seek ways to decrease the negative impact. Examples abound: junk food/fast food and obesity, natural gas hydrofracking and drinking water pollution, etc. You can still reap the profits, you just have to factor in negative effects.
Submitted by PamelaS on May 31, 14:32 ET
2 Agree 0 Disagree
2000 characters remaining
Counterarguments
1 of 1
If they have to pay for the negative side, they should be able to collect on the positive side. Don't you want them to pursue the good things? Plus, it's unfair to only look at the downside. This all becomes a bit uncalculable though.
Submitted by golyadkin on May 31, 14:17 ET
1 Agree 2 Disagree
2000 characters remaining
started by GregOrr on Sep 6

DailyKos discussion

See our DailyKos discussion. Biggest complaint is that the idea is vague. Second-biggest complaint is that taxes flow through to the consumer.
 +1
Start New Topic
Related Ideas
1 of 14
New financial sector laws imposing criminal & civil penalties for negligent or reckless endangerment of public welfare More detail
By: GregOrr
320
facebooktwitterShare on Google+
Establish a corporate death penalty for corporate crimes against society: Exxon Valdez, BP Deepwater Horizon, etc. More detail
facebooktwitterShare on Google+
The US Health Care Industry is the leading cause of death and injury. It is also 20% of the US GDP. More detail
By: Medical
2
facebooktwitterShare on Google+
Content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, except as otherwise noted. Terms of Use. Privacy Policy.
You must be logged in to submit your idea!
 Username/Email
Not a member? Signup Now!