Facebook
Popular Active Recommended Random New
Submitted on May 15, 23:59 ET
US69 - A New Glass-Steagall
Description
We’ve seen all the headlines: JP Morgan Chase took risky bets and lost two billion dollars in a matter of weeks.

Frankly, I don’t think we should just trust Wall Street banks to regulate themselves. Because as we learned during the 2008 financial crisis, they are not just taking risks with their own money -- they are taking risks with the whole economy.

Will you join us in calling on Congress to hold Wall Street accountable and pass a new Glass-Steagall Act?
Click here to stand with us!
Arguments
1 of 5
Why you should care if some idiot trader from JPM, that received at least $390 billion in Fed loans loses $2 billion: because J.P. Morgan is a federally-insured depository institution that has been and will continue to be the recipient of massive amounts of public assistance. If the bank fails, we pay for the cleanup. So when they gamble like drunken sailors, it’s everyone’s problem.
Submitted by SparkyJP on May 15, 23:59 ET
5 Agree 0 Disagree
Redesign the financial sector to invest in the productive economy, businesses trying to make products and offer new services, rather than this trading casino.
Submitted by Bernie Sanders on Sep 10, 22:29 ET
2 Agree 0 Disagree
Shortly after she was first elected to Congress, at a time when both parties were supporting de-regulation of the financial industry, Tammy stood up for Wisconsin taxpayers. She voted against letting Wall Street and the big banks write their own rules — one of only a handful of members of Congress who voted no on repealing the Glass-Steagall Act. The Glass-Steagall Act had been in place since the Great Depression and kept banks from engaging in many of the risky practices that later led to 2008 economic collapse, our nation’s worst recession since the Great Depression.

Source: tammybaldwin.com
Submitted by Tammy Baldwin on Sep 14, 00:38 ET
1 Agree 0 Disagree
Former President Bill Clinton, who is credited for the largest budget surplus in US history, admits that his repeal or Glass-Steagal was a huge mistake.
Submitted by ChokiWukong on Aug 18, 01:59 ET
1 Agree 0 Disagree
I don't want other people gambling with my money on Wall Street.

Glass-Steagall separated Commercial banks from investment banks to prevent this from happening.
Submitted by ChokiWukong on Aug 18, 01:51 ET
1 Agree 0 Disagree
2000 characters remaining
Counterarguments
1 of 1
  • Regulating the Banks is not going to work in this darn age because they're already regulated enough, especially with Donn-Frank still on the books. You used J.P Morgan Chase as an example but to be perfectly honest with you, let them fail. We don't need to bailout no more banks. There are alternatives for people to put their money into, like community banks.
Submitted by Mister_Lane on May 17, 02:06 ET
2 Agree 6 Disagree 1 Reply
2000 characters remaining
started by SparkyJP on Jul 26

Regulation is necessary

Dodd-Frank is a paper tiger, and has been watered-down to the point that it's ineffective. The "big six" U.S. banks (Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo) now possess assets equivalent to approximately 60 percent of America's gross national product. If they fail - so do we! It's still the wild, wild, west on WS, and they're playing with our money!
 +4
Start New Topic
Related Ideas
1 of 5
Content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, except as otherwise noted. Terms of Use. Privacy Policy.
You must be logged in to submit your idea!
 Username/Email
Not a member? Signup Now!