Facebook
Popular Active Recommended Random New
Submitted on Sep 12, 20:48 ET
US521 - Do not trust Social Security to Wall Street
Description
Under the guise of fighting for deficit reduction, the Republicans will unleash an unprecedented attack against Social Security.  They will attempt to slash benefits, raise the retirement age and move toward the eventual privatization of a program which has, for 75 years, successfully lifted many tens of millions of elderly Americans, people with disabilities and widows and orphans out of poverty.  Make no mistake about it: the attempt to destroy Social Security has nothing to do with deficit reduction.  Social Security today has a $2.6 trillion dollar surplus, can pay out every benefit owed to every eligible American for the next 27 years and has not contributed one nickel to the deficit.  This is an ideological struggle on the part of Republicans in Congress and their billionaire backers to undo the most significant government social program in the history of the United States.  They want Wall Street to provide retirement benefits, not Social Security – not because this is a better plan for seniors, but because it ensures massive profits for Wall Street.

Source: bernie.org
Arguments
1 of 6
During their working years, Wisconsinites contribute to Social Security in exchange for a promise that they will receive an income in retirement. They worked for it, they paid for it — they earned it. That is why Tammy has fought to protect the Social Security trust fund from being raided in order to give tax cuts for the wealthy and in 2001, when the country had a budget surplus, she voted for extending the solvency of the Social Security and Medicare programs.

Source: tammybaldwin.com
Submitted by Tammy Baldwin on Sep 14, 01:18 ET
6 Agree 1 Disagree
Privatizing Social Security accounts would drain trillions from the program and put Americans’ safety nets at the whim of Wall Street manipulation and foreign market fluctuations.

Submitted by Shelley Berkley on Oct 12, 10:44 ET
2 Agree 0 Disagree
As we have all seen from the financial catastrophe, the private market is not a safe place to keep our social security funds. Gary opposes any effort toward Social Security privatization.

Submitted by Gary McDowell on Sep 26, 11:45 ET
2 Agree 0 Disagree
Privatizing Social Security would be nothing more than a massive giveaway to many of the very same Wall Street banks that crashed our economy.

Submitted by Heidi Heitkamp on Nov 4, 03:43 ET
1 Agree 0 Disagree

About 90 percent of people aged 65 and older receive Social Security benefits and nearly 2 in 3 get half or more of their income from Social Security. As of December 2011, 36 million retired workers received an average benefit of $1,229 per month and 8.6 million disabled workers received an average benefit of $1,111 per month. The typical replacement rate is about 41 percent for a worker with medium earnings.


Despite this history, Republicans are yet again promising to privatize and cut Social Security and turn it over to Wall Street. The Social Security Trust Fund has a current surplus of $2.7 trillion. While Congress must address the long-term funding challenges to Social Security, any reforms must be focused on ensuring its long-term stability. We cannot turn our backs on the 55 million Americans who receive Social Security benefits.


Source: pelosi.house.gov

Submitted by Nancy Pelosi on Sep 19, 19:44 ET
1 Agree 0 Disagree
Bob is standing up to the extremists who want to privatize Social Security and force people to needlessly risk their retirement savings in the stock market.

Source: menendezfornj.com
Submitted by Bob Menendez on Sep 13, 23:53 ET
1 Agree 0 Disagree
2000 characters remaining
Counterarguments
1 of 1
Social Security is misunderstood by many people. The money you pay in SSI and Medicare taxes, assuming you're employed or in business and paying them, currently is not an investment for your own future. It never has been. It supports those currently on the Social Security dole and enjoying those benefits. Younger generations able to work pay to support the elderly and disabled. That's one cause of the system's troubles because so many have had so few if any children for so long, soon there will be an insufficient number of workers paying into the system to support an overwhelming number of recipients. That's also why some policymakers want to make changes to the system so that the money you pay into the system becomes an investment in your own future, reforming the system so that it more closely resembles what so many people believe it already is (but isn't).
Submitted by quuzlfut on Oct 28, 10:42 ET
0 Agree 1 Disagree
2000 characters remaining

No comments have been submitted for this idea

Start New Topic
Content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, except as otherwise noted. Terms of Use. Privacy Policy.
You must be logged in to submit your idea!
 Username/Email
Not a member? Signup Now!